English Transcription

[GRE writing] Jan. 1, 2024

Sungyeon Kim 2024. 1. 1. 10:39

1.

Question:

The following is a memorandum from the president of a technology company:

'The company should invest in developing a new smartphone model that incorporates the latest technological advancements. Studies show that consumers are increasingly demanding innovative features, and our competitors are already ahead in this regard. Investing in cutting-edge technology will not only meet customer expectations but also ensure our competitiveness in the market.'

 

Model Answer:

The president's argument advocates for the company to invest in developing a new smartphone model that incorporates the latest technological advancements, citing consumer demand and the competitive landscape. However, a critical examination reveals several assumptions that need consideration, including the actual demand for cutting-edge features, the feasibility of development, and the potential impact on market competitiveness.

 

Firstly, the argument assumes that consumers are increasingly demanding innovative features without providing concrete evidence to support this claim. While it is true that technological advancements often drive consumer preferences, the specific features that are in demand may vary. A comprehensive market analysis and consumer survey would be necessary to identify the specific innovations that would truly meet customer expectations.

 

Moreover, the feasibility of developing a new smartphone model with cutting-edge technology is not addressed in the argument. Developing and implementing new technologies can be complex, costly, and time-consuming. The president should provide information on the company's capacity to undertake such a project, including the availability of resources, expertise, and a realistic timeline for development.

 

Lastly, the argument implies that investing in cutting-edge technology will ensure competitiveness in the market, but it does not consider the potential risks and challenges. The competitive landscape is dynamic, and the success of a new smartphone model depends on factors beyond technological features, such as marketing strategies, pricing, and customer service. A comprehensive analysis of the market dynamics and the strategies of competitors is essential for making informed decisions.

 

In conclusion, the president's recommendation to invest in a new smartphone model with cutting-edge technology requires a more thorough analysis of consumer demand, the feasibility of development, and the broader market competitiveness. A well-informed decision should consider these factors to ensure that the company's investment aligns with actual market needs and enhances its position in the competitive landscape.

 

2.

Question:

The following is a memorandum from the president of a technology company:

'The company should invest in developing a new smartphone model that incorporates the latest technological advancements. Studies show that consumers are increasingly demanding innovative features, and our competitors are already ahead in this regard. Investing in cutting-edge technology will not only meet customer expectations but also ensure our competitiveness in the market."

 

Model Answer:

The president's argument advocates for the company to invest in developing a new smartphone model that incorporates the latest technological advancements, citing customer demand and the competitive landscape. However, a critical examination reveals several assumptions that need consideration, including the actual demand for cutting-edge features, the feasibility of development, and the potential impact on market competitiveness.

 

Firstly, the argument assumes that consumers are increasingly demanding innovative features without providing concrete evidence to support this claim. While it is true that technological advancements often drive consumer preferences, the specific features that are in demand may vary. A comprehensive market analysis and consumer survey would be necessary to identify the specific innovations that would truly meet customer expectations.

 

Moreover, the feasibility of developing a new smartphone model with cutting-edge technology is not addressed in the argument. Developing and implementing new technologies can be complex, costly, and time-consuming. The president should provide information on the company's capacity to undertake such a project, including the availability of resources, expertise, and a realistic timeline for development.

 

Lastly, the argument implies that investing in cutting-edge technology will ensure competitiveness in the market, but it does not consider the potential risks and challenges. The competitive landscape is dynamic, and the success of a new smartphone model depends on factors beyond technological features, such as marketing strategies, pricing, and customer service. A comprehensive analysis of the market dynamics and the strategies of competitors is essential for making informed decisions.

 

In conclusion, the president's recommendation to invest in a new smartphone model with cutting-edge technology requires a more thorough analysis of consumer demand, the feasibility of development, and the broader market competitiveness. A well-informed decision should consider these factors to ensure that the company's investment aligns with actual market needs and enhances its position in the competitive landscape.